Image monitoring system

ABSTRACT

An image monitoring system including: an image data acquisition unit for taking in video signals from a camera to acquire image data; and an image recognition unit for carrying out image recognition processing using an inputted image obtained from the image data acquisition unit, wherein the image recognition unit includes: a reference image registration means for registering a reference image selected from among the inputted images; a motion detection means for acquiring motion detection information from the inputted image; an image blur detection means for detecting image blur by comparison of the reference image with the inputted image for edge strength; a similarity computation means for computing a similarity between the reference image and the inputted image; and a camera anomaly detection unit for determining any anomaly in the camera from the motion detection information, the image blur and the similarity, wherein the comparison for edge strength and the computation for the similarity are carried out respectively for an image region excluding a region of a moving object extracted by the motion detection means.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/023,051, filedJan. 31, 2008. This application relates to and claims priority fromJapanese Patent Application No. JP 2007-165744, filed on Jun. 25, 2007.The entirety of the contents and subject matter of all of the above isincorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an image monitoring system having afunction of capturing an image from an imaging device such as a camera,and detecting sabotage to a camera or image acquisition failure due to adefect in equipment.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In general, image monitoring systems have a function of capturing animage from a camera, and detecting a moving object such as a human or avehicle which appears in a monitored area by image recognition. Byutilizing the result of the moving object detection, these imagemonitoring systems are capable of recording only an image in which amoving object appears, causing a display unit to display an alert icon,or sounding a buzzer to alert a guard. Therefore, they are useful forreducing a burden on watching service in which continuous check used tobe required.

Further, the above-mentioned image monitoring systems bring thefollowing advantage: when a crime, such as theft, occurs, it is possibleto make good use of a recorded image to thereafter evidence the crime.

Meanwhile, criminals perform various acts on such image monitoringsystems in an attempt to prevent an evidential image from beingacquired, and this has become problematic. Such acts include changingthe image pickup angle of a camera, placing an obstruction in front of acamera, and destroying a camera. Incidentally, in case that the imagingdevice itself falls in faulty, an image cannot be acquired and there isa possibility that the image monitoring system becomes useless. In thiscase, it is required to notify a responsible guard or the like of thisanomaly in the equipment and repair the camera to restore the imagemonitoring system to a normal state.

As a method for coping with this problem, there is known the techniquedisclosed in JP-A-2000-222646. This method is such that a normal imageof reference is held and an inputted image is compared with this imageto detect any anomaly in a camera.

The method disclosed in JP-A-2000-222646 involves a problem. This methodis based on amount of change in the brightness value of images asfollows. In this method, first, determining is the ratio of pixels wherea brightness difference value between the reference image and aninputted image varies by more than a predetermined value. When thisratio exceeds a predetermined value, it is determined that sabotageagainst the camera has been done and this is notified. This constructioninvolves a problem. When sabotage is obvious, for example, anobstruction is placed or an angle of camera view is changed, an alertcan be put out. However, in an event in which the situation is difficultto estimate, for example, when a pickup image blur occurs in a lens,there is a possibility that the system fails to put out an alert.(“Blur” cited in this specification refers to a state in which an imageis not clear and bleary.) Conversely, when normal change, such as changein lighting conditions and a shift in the weather, occur, there is apossibility that erroneous alerts are frequently put out.

The invention has been made to solve the above problems. The inventionis to provide an image monitoring system in which any anomaly in acamera can be properly detected even when an image blur, change inlighting conditions, or a shift in the weather occurs.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

To solve the above problems, an image monitoring system of the inventionincludes: an image data acquisition unit for taking in video signalsfrom one or more imaging devices such as a camera to acquire image data;a reference image registration unit for registering a reference imageselected from among inputted image data from the image data acquisitionunits; an image blur detection unit for detecting a difference in imageblur between the reference image and the inputted image; a similaritycomputation unit for computing the similarity between the referenceimage and the inputted image; and a camera anomaly detection unit fordetecting any anomaly in the camera from the difference in the imageblur and the similarity.

According to the invention, it is possible to provide an imagemonitoring system capable of detecting any anomaly in an image inputtedfrom a camera even when an image blur, change in lighting conditions, ora shift in the weather occurs.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a drawing illustrating the overall configuration of anembodiment of the invention;

FIG. 2 is a drawing illustrating the configuration of a motion detectionunit of the invention with a focus on the processing carried out by eachpart;

FIG. 3 is a drawing illustrating a reference image registration unit ofthe invention;

FIG. 4 is a drawing illustrating a user interface used when a referenceimage is registered in the invention;

FIG. 5 is a drawing illustrating a camera anomaly detection unit of theinvention;

FIG. 6 is a drawing illustrating the overall configuration of anembodiment of the invention in which integrated determination is carriedout using peripheral camera information in camera anomaly detection;

FIG. 7 is a drawing illustrating a user interface used when acomplementary camera is set in the invention;

FIG. 8 is a drawing illustrating a camera anomaly detection integrateddetermination unit of the invention;

FIG. 9 is a drawing illustrating an embodiment of the invention in whichperipheral camera control is added; and

FIG. 10 is a drawing illustrating a user interface used when a camerasetting value is changed in the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS First Embodiment

Hereafter, description will be given to an embodiment of the inventionwith reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 illustrates the configuration ofan image monitoring system to which camera anomaly detection is applied.Its hardware is constructed of an electronic computer system having CPU,and various functions are carried out by respective units. The imagemonitoring system is constructed of: an image data acquisition unit 10that acquires image data from video signals obtained from one imagingdevice such as a TV camera; an image recognition unit 20 that capturesthe image data from the image data acquisition unit 10 and carries outimage recognition processing; a recording control unit 30 that controlsrecording, a data compression ratio of a recorded image, and recordingintervals, by using a result of computation obtained by the imagerecognition unit 20; an output unit 40 that outputs a result ofprocessing carried out by the image recognition unit 20 and an imagefrom the image data acquisition unit 10 to a monitor or the like, andoutputs an alert by sounding a buzzer or by other like means ifrequired; and an input unit 50 for registering a reference image andinputting various set values through a user interface or the like.

The image data acquisition unit 10 takes in video signals from thecamera in real time or takes in recorded video signals from a videorecorder, and acquires one-dimensional array or two-dimensional arrayimage data from those video signals. In order to reduce the influence ofnoise, flicker, or the like, this image data may be subjected topreprocessing such as smoothing filtering, edge enhancement filtering,or density conversion. Additionally, depending on usage, data format forRGB color, monochrome, or the like may be adopted. Further, in order toreduce a processing cost, image data may be reduced to a predeterminedsize.

The image recognition unit 20 is comprised of: a motion detection unit100 for detecting motion in an image data captured from the image dataacquisition unit 10; a reference image registration unit 200 forregistering a reference image which is selected and set by the inputunit 50 from among image data captured from the image data acquisitionunit 10; a reference image storage unit 300 for holding the referenceimage registered by the reference image registration unit 200; and acamera anomaly detection unit 400 for detecting any anomaly in thecamera from the following: a result of computation by the motiondetection unit 100, the image data acquired by the image dataacquisition unit 10, and a reference image held in the reference imagestorage unit 300.

Detailed description will be given to processing carried out in theimage recognition unit 20. FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the motiondetection unit 100 illustrating internal processing carried out therein.The motion detection unit 100 is comprised of: a feature extraction unit101 for extracting a feature from image data captured by the image dataacquisition unit 10; a background image generation unit 102 forgenerating a background image to be a comparison criterion from imagedata captured by the image data acquisition unit 10; and a variationextraction unit 103 for comparing the feature in image data extracted bythe feature extraction unit 101 with the background image to extract anyvariation.

As features obtained by the feature extraction unit 101, the followingcan be listed: lightness value and RGB value computed with respect toeach pixel in an inputted image; feature amount computed by an arbitraryoperator, for example, which is edge strength and direction computed bya differentiation filter such as a Sobel operator; and feature vectorobtained by integrating them. The feature amounts are different inrobustness against environmental fluctuation and detection accuracy andit is required to determine a feature amount corresponding to asituation. This embodiment selects a lightness value, which is mostcommon.

Next, Description will be given to the background image generation unit102. Images to be generated by the background image generation unit 102do not embrace a moving object, and ideal images thereby generated areweather that changes from hour to hour or change in the environment,including lighting conditions. The reason for this is as follows:provided a moving object is embraced in a background image, and when amoving object and an inputted image data are compared with each other,there is a possibility that the moving object embraced in the backgroundimage is detected as a variation; and provided an environmental changeis not taken account in the background image, there is a possibilitythat variations in lightness of the background image and lightness ofinputted image data due to illumination are detected as a variation ofthe extracted feature. In order to cope with such situations, thebackground image generation unit 102 in this embodiment uses thefollowing technique: a result of extraction obtained by the variationextraction unit 103 is utilized to statistical processing for carryingout to reconstruct the background image embracing no moving object. Anexample of the statistical processing is such that the background imagegeneration unit 102 eliminates the influence of the moving object fromimages captured during a certain period by utilizing the featureextraction result from the variation extraction unit 103, and averagesthose images after eliminating the influence of the moving object. Instead of such a statistical processing, it is made possible for a guardto select a background image from among image data manually and registerit. This makes it possible to generate a background image which does notembrace a moving object. Therefore, it is possible to generate thebackground image in account of environmental changes and thus detect thefeature variation extracted by the variation extraction unit 103 withaccuracy.

Incidentally, images in the camera differ according to isolationcondition depending on weather or season. Therefore, the followingmeasure can also be taken: multiple background images corresponding torespective situations are held; a background image to be used at presentare selected automatically from among these multiple images and thepresent background image is automatically updated by the selected imageaccording to information about time of day, season, or lightness. Thismakes it possible to reduce the frequency of erroneous alerts.

Next, description will be given to the variation extraction unit 103.Methods used by the variation extraction unit 103 include the following:a method of carrying out computation for the feature variation on apixel-by-pixel basis; a method of carrying out determination for thefeature variation in a local area including pixels of interest; and amethod of expanding a criterion or the feature variation in thedirection of a temporal axis according several frames of inputtedimages, etc. This embodiment adopts a computation method of obtainingthe feature variation by a differential operation on a pixel-by-pixelbasis. Hereafter, concrete description will be given to this computationmethod. When image data is two-dimensionally arranged, a pixel positionp indicating arbitrary x-coordinate and y-coordinate is represented asp=(x,y). The lightness value of a background image at this pixelposition p is expressed as B_(p), and the lightness value of an inputtedimage is expressed as I_(p). The amount of change Δ_(p) between thebackground image and the inputted image at the pixel position p iscomputed as Δ_(p)=B_(p)−I_(p). When Δ_(p) is equal to or higher than apredetermined threshold value, the pixel is determined to be in thefeature variation. When this determination is carried out over theentire image, the region of the feature variation can be extracted asthe region of a moving object. By the way, in per pixel, since eachpixel can react to noise or the like, there is a possibility that theregion of the feature variation (moving object) is over-detected ordetected in a worm-eaten pattern. In order to cope with this, the regiondetermined to be the feature variation is subjected to shaping byexpanding or contracting extracted pixels. The result of extraction forthe feature variation by the variation extraction unit 103 is outputtedto the camera anomaly detection unit 400. It is also outputted to therecording control unit 30, and thus it is also possible to carry outrecording control by motion detection.

Next, description will be given to the reference image registration unit200 used for camera anomaly detection with reference to FIG. 3. Here, afeature of the reference image specified from the input unit 50 isacquired by the feature extraction unit 201, as with by theabove-mentioned feature extraction unit 101. The reference image is animage representative of the monitored area where the monitoring camerais installed. The reference image can be made a choice, registered, andupdated based on an image inputted live by a guard or maintenancepersonnel through the user interface illustrated in FIG. 4. Thisoperation is performed through the input unit 50, and the image isdisplayed on the monitor by the output unit 40. The image registeredhere is stored in the reference image storage unit 300. With respect tothe reference image, the same measure as in the background imagegeneration unit 102 may be taken. That is, it may be automaticallyregistered and updated so that it is an image embracing no moving objectand take in account of weather that changes from hour to hour or changein the environment, including lighting conditions.

Next, description will be given to the camera anomaly detection unit 400with reference to FIG. 5. The camera anomaly detection unit 400 takes indata from the image data acquisition unit 10, reference image storageunit 300 and motion detection unit 100, and finally determines thedegree of anomaly in the camera through a camera anomaly determinationunit 403. First, a feature extraction unit 401 computes a feature of aninputted image. Outline information is effective in grasping thestructure of an area to be monitored with accuracy. Therefore, edgeenhancement is carried out through a differentiation filter for images,and the outline is taken as a feature amount. The brightness of anentire image is also information effective in camera anomaly detection;therefore, it is used together. The same result of feature amountcomputation is also held in the reference image storage unit 300. Then,the reference image variation extraction unit 402 detects any variationbetween the previously registered reference image and an inputted imagefrom the feature extraction unit 401.

Detailed description will be give to the flow of this processing. Anarbitrary position in an image is expressed as p=(x,y). The edgestrength of a reference image at this position p is expressed asB^(edge) _(p), and the edge strength of the inputted image is expressedas I^(edge) _(p). Then, the difference in edge strength between thereference image and the inputted image at the pixel position p can beexpressed as Δ_(p) ^(edge)=B^(edge) _(p)−I^(edge) _(p). This differenceis determined with respect to all pixels in the entire image, and allthe results are added. The result of the addition is shown by thefollowing [Expression 1], which represents the difference in edgestrength between the reference image and the inputted image.

Δ^(edge)=ΣΔ^(edge) _(p)  [Expression 1]

Further, the average values of the edge strength of the entire imagesare respectively expressed as B ^(edge) and Ī^(edge). When there is adifference between them, it turns out that a blur has occurred in thecamera as compared with normal camera images. The average difference inedge strength between the entire images is expressed by the following[Expression 2].

Δ ^(edge) = B ^(edge) −Ī ^(edge)  [Expression 2]

Aside from the foregoing, frequency analysis and the like are alsoeffective means. When a high-frequency component is reduced, that can bedetermined as a blur.

Further, the similarity between images can be obtained by the differenceΔ= B−Ī in brightness average value between entire images or bycorrelation value computation such as normalized correlation computationindicated by [Expression 3].

$\begin{matrix}{\Delta_{cc} = \frac{\sum\limits^{\;}\; {\left( {I_{p} - \overset{\_}{I}} \right)\left( {B_{p} - \overset{\_}{B}} \right)}}{\sqrt{\sum\limits^{\;}\; \left( {I_{p} - \overset{\_}{I}} \right)^{2}}\sqrt{\sum\limits^{\;}\; \left( {B_{p} - \overset{\_}{B}} \right)^{2}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Expression}\mspace{14mu} 3} \right\rbrack\end{matrix}$

Further, the result of detection by the motion detection unit 100 isutilized by the camera anomaly determination unit 403. To simplysuppress erroneous motion detection due to the presence of a movingobject within an image, it is effective to use a number of motiondetection blocks N^(motion) as an index for the camera anomalydetermination, wherein the number of the motion detection blocksN^(motion) is, for example, listed by an extent of the region of themoving object extracted by the motion detection unit 100, a number ofpixels, or the like. Here, the above-mentioned difference in edgestrength, difference in edge strength average, and similarity may becomputed about an entire image or an image region excluding the regionof a moving object extracted by the motion detection unit 100. Thedegree of camera anomaly R_(alarm) determined by the anomalydetermination unit 403 is indicated by [Expression 4].

R _(alarm)=Δ^(edge)+ Δ ^(edge)+Δ_(cc) +N ^(motion)  [Expression 4]

As shown by [Expression 4], even when an image blur, change in lightingconditions, or change in the weather occurs, any camera anomaly can beappropriately determined by taking the following measure: the results ofindividual image comparison are integrated, and a predeterminedthreshold value determination is carried out.

Second Embodiment

Description will be given to another embodiment with reference to FIG.6. This embodiment relates to an image monitoring system of monitoring atarget area by plural cameras which are installed on the periphery ofthe area. The plural cameras are generally called as peripheral cameras.In this embodiment, information from the peripheral cameras is used tofurther enhance the reliability of the above camera anomalydetermination. Furthermore, the image monitoring system in FIG. 6 isconfigured by further adding the following to the construction of theabove-precedent embodiment to: an image data acquisition unit 11, animage recognition unit 21, a camera anomaly detection integrateddetermination unit 60, and a camera information setting unit 70. In thisembodiment, although the system so constructed that images can beinputted from two cameras the invention is also applicable to a systemhaving three or more cameras.

In comparison of a reference image from the reference image registrationunit 200 with an inputted image, when a rapid change has occurred in theimage pickup environment, the system may not always determinedappropriately between the rapid change and sabotage to the cameraprovided that only one camera is used for the system. In order to copewith this, it is utilized that there is not so great a difference in thelightness of images, dispersion, color information, or the like betweenthe images from peripheral cameras installed in the same monitored areaprovided that the monitored area is in normal. That is, when the cameraanomaly detection unit 400 corresponding to one camera determines thatthe degree of camera anomaly R_(alarm) is equal to or higher than apredetermined value, the following processing is carried out: a featureof an image acquired by the image data acquisition unit 10 and a featureof an image acquired by the image data acquisition unit 11 are comparedwith each other at the camera anomaly detection integrated determinationunit 60; and a factor of certainty of camera anomaly determination bythe camera anomaly detection unit 400 is thereby determined. A camerafor complementing the image information of another camera is set by theinput unit 50 and the camera information setting unit 70. As illustratedin FIG. 7, a camera for picking up an image of an area overlapping thearea covered by another camera is set as a complementary camera. Then,one and the same object is specified. Thus, when either of cameras isobstructed by an object, it can be determined whether a camera is inabnormal state or a layout is changed. This setting is carried out byspecifying an object a1, a2 as illustrated in FIG. 7.

Description will be given to the camera anomaly detection integrateddetermination unit 60 with reference to FIG. 8. This description is onthe assumption that in the image recognition unit 21, sabotage has notbeen committed against the image data acquisition unit 11 for acquiringimages from the complementary camera. Using images acquired from theimage data acquisition unit 10 and the image data acquisition unit 11,the degree of difference in object between the cameras is determined bya camera-to-camera variation detection unit 601 and a camera-to-cameraobject determination unit 602.

The camera-to-camera variation detection unit 601 compares basicinformation of the images. In the description of this embodiment, a casewhere the average brightness of the entire images is applied will betaken as an example. The variation in average brightness between theimages can be computed as Δ= B−Ī. When the variation is equal to orhigher than a predetermined value, it is determined that there is adifference between the images.

The camera-to-camera object determination unit 602 determines whether ornot the identical objects a1, a2 in FIG. 7 exist in the identical areausing pattern matching for images. There are various pattern matchingmethods applicable to comparison computation. This embodiment adoptssimplest SAD (Sum of Absolute Difference). In SAD, the respectivebrightness values in a pixel position p are taken as A1 _(p) and A2_(p). Letting the total number of pixels in each image data be M, thesimilarity S can be computed as S=Σ|A1 _(p)−A2 _(p)|/M. When an objectexists in the complementary camera but does not in the image dataacquisition unit 10, there is a high possibility that the camera isobstructed or some other like even has occurred.

A camera anomaly determination unit 603 determines a camera anomaly byusing the following: a difference information between the cameras, whichis determined by the camera-to-camera variation detection unit 601 andthe camera-to-camera object determination unit 602, and the result ofdetection by the camera anomaly detection unit 400. The result ofdetermination is transferred to the output unit 40 and the recordingcontrol unit 30. When some camera is determined to be abnormal, therecording control unit 30 can also carry out processing to startrecording of an image acquired by a peripheral camera.

Use of plural camera images to determine any anomaly in a camera as inthis embodiment brings the following advantage: when rapid change occursin the image pickup environment or sabotage is committed against acamera, that can be appropriately determined. Further, when some camerais determined to be abnormal, the following can be implemented:recording of an image acquired by a peripheral camera is started; and itis thereby made possible to complement information of the camera that isabnormal and cannot acquire a normal image by the peripheral camera.

Third Embodiment

When a camera is determined to be abnormal in camera anomaly detectionin the above embodiment, an image cannot be picked up by that camera anymore. To cope with this, the image pickup range can be complemented by aperipheral camera. Description will be given to an image monitoringsystem additionally provided with this function with reference to FIG.9. This embodiment is constructed by adding a camera with PTZ(Pan/Tilt/Zoom) functions and a camera position control unit 80 to theabove second embodiment. When camera 1 is determined to be abnormal bythe camera anomaly detection integrated determination unit 60 withpreset PTZ, the following processing is carried out: the PTZ setting ischanged based on the complementing setting effective when the cameraanomaly occurred, and it is thereby made possible to complement theimage pickup range of camera 1 where the camera anomaly occurred. Morespecific description will be given. When a camera is determined to beabnormal, it is made possible to pick up an image in the directioncovered by the camera determined to be abnormal based on a predeterminedparameter of a preset complementary camera. The PTZ setting effectivewhen a camera is abnormal can be changed through the user interfaceillustrated in FIG. 10. That is, a camera that should be used tocomplement the image pickup range of camera 1 is selected, and a panangle, tilt angle, and zoom setting value for determining the imagepickup range of that camera are set. Based on these set values, thecamera position control unit 80 changes the camera setting of the PTZcamera.

When any anomaly in some camera is detected, as mentioned above, theimage pickup range of a peripheral camera is so set as to complement theimage pickup range of the abnormal camera. Thus, the image pickup rangeof the monitoring camera in which an anomaly has occurred can be morereliably complemented. Therefore, it is possible to provide a monitoringsystem robust against sabotage against a camera.

According to the above-mentioned embodiments, it is possible to detectany anomaly in an image inputted from a camera and to display it on amonitor or send out a warning to alert a guard. Even if sabotage iscommitted against a camera, it is possible to prevent missing picking upan image of the crime. Therefore, the invention is especially effectivefor monitoring systems prone to sabotage against a camera.

1. An image monitoring system comprising: an image data acquisition unitfor taking in video signals from a camera to acquire image data; and animage recognition unit for carrying out image recognition processingusing an inputted image obtained from the image data acquisition unit,wherein the image recognition unit includes: a reference imageregistration means for registering a reference image selected from amongthe inputted images; a motion detection means for acquiring motiondetection information from the inputted image; an image blur detectionmeans for detecting image blur by comparison of the reference image withthe inputted image for edge strength; a similarity computation means forcomputing a similarity between the reference image and the inputtedimage; and a camera anomaly detection unit for determining any anomalyin the camera from the motion detection information, the image blur andthe similarity, wherein the comparison for edge strength and thecomputation for the similarity are carried out respectively for an imageregion excluding a region of a moving object extracted by the motiondetection means.
 2. The image monitoring system according to claim 1,wherein the similarity computation means computes the similarity from adifference in brightness value or a correlation value in brightnessvalue.
 3. The image monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein themotion detection means includes a means for automatically generating abackground image from the inputted image, and wherein the motiondetection unit acquires the motion detection information by comparisonof the background image with the inputted image.
 4. An image monitoringsystem comprising: two or more cameras including a first camera and asecond camera; two or more image data acquisition units for taking invideo signals from the cameras to acquire two or more image data; and animage recognition unit for carrying out image recognition processingusing inputted images obtained from the image data acquisition units;wherein the image recognition unit includes: a reference imageregistration means for registering a reference image from among firstinputted images from the first camera; a motion detection means foracquiring motion detection information from the first inputted image; animage blur detection means for detecting image blur by comparison of thereference image with the first inputted image for edge strength; asimilarity computation unit for computing a similarity between the firstinputted image and the reference image; and a camera anomaly detectionunit for determining any anomaly in the first camera from a secondinputted image from the second camera, the motion detection information,the image blur and the similarity, wherein the comparison for edgestrength and the computation for the similarity are carried outrespectively for an image region excluding a region of a moving objectextracted by the motion detection means.
 5. The image monitoring systemaccording to claim 4, wherein the similarity computation unit computesthe similarity by a difference in brightness value or a correlationvalue in brightness value.
 6. The image monitoring system according toclaim 4, wherein the motion detection means includes a means forautomatically generating a background image from the first inputtedimage, and wherein the motion detection unit acquires the motiondetection information by comparison of the background image with thefirst inputted image.
 7. The image monitoring system according to claim4, wherein when one and the same object exists in the image pickupranges of the first camera and the second camera, the camera anomalydetection unit uses the object being embraced both in the first inputtedimage and in the second inputted image, in camera anomaly determination.8. The image monitoring system according to claim 4, wherein when thecamera anomaly detection unit detects any anomaly in the first camera,the monitored area of each camera other than the first camera is shiftedto the direction in which the monitored area of the first camera iscomplemented.
 9. The image monitoring system according to claim 4,wherein when the camera anomaly detection unit detects any anomaly inthe first camera, recording of an inputted image from each camera otherthan the first camera is started.